基于范畴论的AGI比较框架

Arxiv cs.AI2026-04-01🔗 查看原文
论文提出以代数与范畴论为基础的通用框架,用于形式化描述、比较和分析各类候选AGI架构(如RL、因果RL、普适AI、主动推理、模式学习等)。借鉴“范畴中的机器”观点,作者给出对RL、因果RL和Schema-based Learning的初步范畴化表述,旨在揭示不同方法的共性与差异、指引未来研究方向,并为统一AGI的架构、信息组织、主体-环境交互、行为发展与实证评估奠定形式化基础。
原文内容
arXiv:2603.28906v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: AGI has become the Holly Grail of AI with the promise of level intelligence and the major Tech companies around the world are investing unprecedented amounts of resources in its pursuit. Yet, there does not exist a single formal definition and only some empirical AGI benchmarking frameworks currently exist. The main purpose of this paper is to develop a general, algebraic and category theoretic framework for describing, comparing and analysing different possible AGI architectures. Thus, this Category theoretic formalization would also allow to compare different possible candidate AGI architectures, such as, RL, Universal AI, Active Inference, CRL, Schema based Learning, etc. It will allow to unambiguously expose their commonalities and differences, and what is even more important, expose areas for future research. From the applied Category theoretic point of view, we take as inspiration Machines in a Category to provide a modern view of AGI Architectures in a Category. More specifically, this first position paper provides, on one hand, a first exercise on RL, Causal RL and SBL Architectures in a Category, and on the other hand, it is a first step on a broader research program that seeks to provide a unified formal foundation for AGI systems, integrating architectural structure, informational organization, agent realization, agent and environment interaction, behavioural development over time, and the empirical evaluation of properties. This framework is also intended to support the definition of architectural properties, both syntactic and informational, as well as semantic properties of agents and their assessment in environments with explicitly characterized features. We claim that Category Theory and AGI will have a very symbiotic relation.